“Human rights are more than just principals enshrined in international law. They are the bedrock of successful and progressive societies. Evidence shows that countries where human rights are respected tend to be more prosperous, democratic and stable, Corruption is less likely to take root, and extremism is less likely to find fertile ground. That is why safeguarding, promoting and defending human rights, including freedom of religion or belief, is a key and integral part of the work of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. British diplomats put human rights at the heart of everything they do . . . ”
Minister for Human Rights, Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon in the FCO’s 2016 Human Rights & Democracy Report.
“As I have said, Israel guarantees the rights of people of all religions, races and sexualities, and it wants to enable everyone to flourish. Our aim in Britain is the same: to create a better, fairer society, helping everyone to reach as far as their talents will allow.”
Teresa May, mealy-mouthed British Prime minister (July 2016 - July2019) addressing the Conservative Friends of Israel lunch, December 2016.
Ever since Britain’s 1917 Balfour Declaration — the culmination of a calculated international effort by Zionists to secure a “legal” document that buoyed their fraudulent claims over Palestine https://bit.ly/2V96iRA — successive British governments have obsequiously grovelled before Zionism and its brainchild, the Apartheid State of Israel. The prevalence of such subservient allegiance to Israel amongst British politicians was, and still is, enforced through the weaponisation of “anti-Semitism” which was for example recently deployed against the Labour Party to oust its leader Jeremy Corbin https://bit.ly/3bmzA59, who was an avid supporter of Palestinian human rights https://bit.ly/3a6XvUN. Israel’s hypocritically professed intention of guaranteeing “the rights of people of all religions, races and sexualities” — as outlined in its Constitution https://bit.ly/2Kbulcm — is apparently not applicable to Palestinians whom the “principled” Jewish State has been gradually but systematically ethnic cleansing since its illegitimate inception in 1948.
“Israelis and American Jews fully agree that the memory of the Holocaust is an indispensable weapon — one that must be used relentlessly against their common enemy . . . Jewish organisations and individuals thus labor continuously to remind the world of it. In America, the perpetuation of the Holocaust memory is now a $100-million-a-year enterprise, part of which is government-funded. Books with Holocaust themes, documentaries, feature films, TV programs, memorials and museums are a staple of America’s cultural diet.”
Israeli author Moshe Leshem in Balaam's Curse: How Israel Lost Its Way, and How It Can Find It Again. Simon & Schuster, August 1989.
The existence of such a formidable “Holocaust Industry” with which to discredit and silence justified criticism of Israel’s blatant criminality is not, however, confined to the United States and Britain has readily taken its pride of place amongst all those other western nations who disregard moral principles, slurp from an Apartheid trough overflowing with Palestinian blood, and pay homage to a State guilty of genocide as defined by the US Holocaust Memorial Museum which states that “genocide is an internationally recognised crime where acts are committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. These acts fall into five categories that include killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; forcibly transferring children of the group to another group; and a number of other serious, violent crimes that do not fall under the specific definition of genocide including crimes against humanity, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and mass killing” https://bit.ly/3eroYne.
The hyper-vigilant, pro-Israel lobby’s Machiavellian influence in orchestrating the removal of Corbyn was further buttressed by the election of his successor, Sir Keir Rodney Starmer, whose knighthood should not be taken as a measure of his suitability to lead either the Labour Party or the nation. This is because such honours have often been conferred on infamous rogues such as paedophile Jimmy Saville — the English DJ, television, and radio personality who despite abusing up to 1,000 girls and boys — who after being interviewed by police in 2007, was subsequently not prosecuted due to the Crown Prosecution Service advising “there was insufficient evidence to take any further action.” Keir Starmer was the Director of Public Prosecutions from November 2008 to November 2013 https://bit.ly/2Kgl82M.
Starmer’s election as Labour Party leader was welcomed by the pro-Israel lobby because of his support for Zionism “without qualification” as reported in The Times of Israel which also cited his apology to the Jewish community for anti-Semitism in Labour’s ranks, calling it a “stain” and pledging to “stamp it out.” While anti-Semitism — like any other hate crime — should indeed be “stamped out,” such commendable concern by this highly principled Knight of the Real does not apparently extend to the Palestinian people whom The Jewish State and “only democracy in the Middle East” with the “most moral army in the world” is ethnically cleansing with cold-bloodied and barbaric impunity https://bit.ly/3ai7yX1.
The true nature of Starmer’s moral integrity became apparent subsequent to his becoming party leader in a report that revealed he had received a £50,000 donation from pro-Israel lobbyist Trevor Chinn: a fact that was not disclosed until after the polls had closed in the leadership election. Throughout the duration of that election, Starmer consistently refused to name the full list of those who donated to his campaign https://bit.ly/2z6y3BL. The pernicious existence of such allegiance to an Apartheid Israeli State within the ranks of parliament raises the question of which is the greater longterm threat to British society: the grovelling hypocrisy of spineless bought and paid for politicians, or the current global scourge of coronavirus?