Can Zionism’s Supplanting Of Judaism And Subversion Of Western Democracy Be Reversed?

“ . . . For almost a hundred years, Zionism fulfilled both roles, becoming not only Israel’s state ideology but its citizens’ secular religion, effectively supplanting Judaism as the primary source of self-identification and focus of allegiance. Yet the very success of Zionism resulted in disenchantment, because reality has fallen short of the founding fathers’ utopian vision of a just, moral society — “a light unto the nations.” The disillusionment, in turn, spawned a host of alternative ideological approaches, ultimately crystallising into a serious challenge to the very essence of Israel’s national ethos.”

Ilana Kass and Bard O’Neill, The Deadly Embrace: The Impact of Israeli and Palestinian Rejectionism on the Peace Process.

Having made enormous sacrifices in both human and material terms to overcome the threat of Nazi Germany during World War Two, Western nations understandably paused — but only briefly — to contemplate the cost of preserving their precious freedoms which they then proceeded to slowly but surely surrender by allowing themselves to be blackmailed, bribed, and bullied into submissive and silent acquiescence by Zionism’s creation of a dedicated, determined, and diabolic “Holocaust Industry” that masqueraded as Judaism’s watchdog against anti-Semitism while ethnically cleansing the Palestinian people.

“Even today I am willing to volunteer to do the dirty work for Israel, to kill as many Arabs as necessary, to deport them, to expel and burn them, to have everyone hate us, to pull the rug from underneath the feet of the Diaspora Jews, so that they will be forced to run to us crying. Even if it means blowing up one or two synagogues here and there, I don't care. And I don't mind if after the job is done you put me in front of a Nuremberg Trial and then jail me for life. Hang me if you want, as a war criminal. Then you can spruce up your Jewish conscience and enter the respectable club of civilised nations, nations that are large and healthy. What you lot don't understand is that the dirty work of Zionism is not finished yet, far from it.”

Former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, 1983


While Judaism is an ancient religion with established ethical principles, Zionism is a relatively recent phenomenon that can be justifiably described as an ideology whose unprincipled objective was to change the Jewish people’s disposition from that of a religious entity into a powerful political movement for the establishment of a supposedly “Jewish” state. Though that objective was staunchly opposed from the very start by the Jewish people’s spiritual leaders, Zionists nonetheless prevailed — with the help of a universally subservient media — by deceiving well-intentioned Jewish people and a very gullible world with fraudulent propaganda, false flag operations, and flagrant acts of terror even against Jews. The chasm between Judaism as a religion and Zionism as the usurper of that religion has been frequently expounded upon including the following observation:

“Zionism and Judaism is not one thing but two different things. And of course two contradicting one another. Zionism starts at the place where Judaism is destroyed . . . one thing is certain, Zionism is not a continuation or healing of wounded Judaism, but rather an uprooting.”

Chaim Chassas, in the Zionist newspaper, Ha’Arutz, 1943

The reality of Zionism’s true nature was established by Theodor Herzl — who despite being generally acknowledged as the founder of Zionism, was actually preceded by scholars such as Yehuda Bibas, Zvi Hirsch Kalischer, and Judah Alkalai who promoted Zionist ideas before him — proposed that the eradication of anti-Semitism required both the active encouragement and promotion of anti-Semitism so as to further the cause of Zionism and thereby facilitate the creation of a “Jewish” state.

“It is essential that the sufferings of Jews . . . become worse . . . this will assist in realisation of our plans . . . I have an excellent idea . . . I shall induce anti-Semites to liquidate Jewish wealth . . . The anti-Semites will assist us thereby in that they will strengthen the persecution and oppression of Jews. The anti-Semites shall be our best friends.”

Theodor Herzl


Herzl’s assertion thereby established the importance of having anti-Semitism — whether real, imagined, or deliberately concocted — play a vital role in realising the objectives of Zionism which falsely presented itself as being “the national revival movement of the Jewish people,” while asserting that Jewish people had the right to self-determination in their own national home with the right to develop their national culture: rights that the Palestinian people are not allowed to enjoy even on their own land which is slowly but surely being illegally expropriated to satisfy the aspirations of a Zionist ideology that purports to represent the Jewish people.

So even before the Second World War’s guilt-ridden toleration by the West of Israel’s destruction of some 560 Palestinian villages and the ruthless expulsion of over 750,000 Palestinian civilians which became known as the Nakba, or “Catastrophe,” — supporters of which are now to be fined ( — the Zionists were already laying the foundations for the instigation of what would turn out to be a British-sanctioned — ( — ethnic cleansing of Palestine. The extent to which Zionism influenced the Balfour Declaration was further confirmed by a recent study — authored by Efraim Halevy, a former head of Mossad — which alleges that the Jewish espionage network NILI played a vital role in the formation of the Balfour Declaration that helped pave the way for the establishment of Israel. (

An attempt in April 1948 by the Fighters for the Freedom of Israel to recruit Albert Einstein to help raise funds, however, proved unsuccessful when he replied as follows:

Mr. Shepard Rifkin Exec. Director

American Friends of the

Fighters for the Freedom of Israel

149 Second Ave. New York 3,N.Y.

Dear Sir:

When a real and final catastrophe should befall us in Palestine the first responsible for it would be the British and the second responsible for it the Terrorist organisations build up from our own ranks.

I am not willing to see anybody associated with those misled and criminal people.

Sincerely yours,

Albert Einstein.

Later in December of that year — when Menachem Begin the former terrorist leader of the Zionist militant group Irgun visited the U.S. to establish political legitimacy — Einstein sent the following letter which was co-signed by 27 other prominent Jews to The New York Times. (

Since then Israeli Jewish lobby efforts — with the assistance of many Jews in diaspora — to influence Western governments in particular have been surreptitiously persistent and successful in curtailing democratic rights to freedom of expression that justifiably and legitimately criticise Israel’s criminality. Previously when decent people began condemning Zionism, they were glibly informed that it had nothing to do with Judaism. But as it subsequently became gradually apparent to more and more people — who began to speak out — that the blatant and barbarous criminality of Zionist Israel would not be possible without the toleration and/or support of the majority of Jews in diaspora, efforts to silence those people are now being made with the threatening assertion that anti-Zionism is the “New” anti-Semitism.

The erosive effects of such efforts on what are now laughingly perceived as being “Western democracies,” is unequivocally demonstrated in the following — essential viewing for those concerned about retaining what little is left of their right to freedom of expression — video report of an Al Jazeera investigation of how Israel influences British politics. (

Zionism’s clandestine subversion of Western democracies with untold influence over their governments was reconfirmed earlier this year — by that exceptional superpower champion of democracy and human rights — when according to The Washington Post “all 100 U.S. Senators signed a letter Thursday asking U.N. Secretary General António Guterres to address what the lawmakers call entrenched bias against Israel at the world body.” The U.S. has for decades obligingly vilified and vetoed UN resolutions against Israel as per the following hypocritical and brazen codswallop: (

In July a bill that would criminalise boycotts — of the type used effectively to end Apartheid in South Africa — against Israel was signed by 45 US senators and 237 congressman with a view to having the so-called “Israel Anti-Boycott Act” impose fines of up to $250,000 (£192,000) on any US citizen “engaged in interstate or foreign commerce” who supports a boycott of Israeli goods and services. Just stop for a moment and think about that: criticising the impunity of Israeli crimes against humanity — as defined by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights — is already or will be a crime in the so-called democracy in which you live. This bill, while disguised as opposition to BDS, is actually a war on the democracy of the American people and their right to free expression. More recently the Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted 17-4 to pass a Bill that would suspend U.S. financial aid to the Palestinian Authority until they agree to end social programs which Congressmen described as providing a “financial incentive” for what they called terrorism, but is actually justified and legitimate resistance to an illegitimate and oppressive occupation.


Congressional subservience to whatever Israel demands is rewarded annually — apart from the other fringe benefits including — with week-long trips to Israel ( that are paid for by the (American Israel Education Foundation (AIEF), an arm of the all-powerful AIPAC organisation. Such Israeli magnanimity is not restricted to the U.S. and politicians from other nations — especially from the West — are equally feted and consequently obligated to Israel as is evident from the following quotes which should only be read within proximity of a suitable facility in case you need to throw up while asking yourself what planet are these people living on?

“When I'm president, believe me, I will veto any attempt by the U.N. to impose its will on the Jewish state. It will be vetoed 100 percent.”

Presidential Candidate Donald Trump addressing the AIPAC conference in 2016.

“I’m opposed to the BDS movement. I think that it’s an example of the new form of anti-Semitism in the world . . . an example of the three ‘Ds’: demonisation of Israel, delegitimisation of Israel, and double standard applied toward Israel.”

Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada.

“ . . . That means that we’ll never be neutral and that Israel can be sure of our support when it comes to ensuring its security . . . That’s why I also said that Germany’s support for Israel’s security is part of our national ethos, our raison d’être.”

German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

“We will never surrender to the messages of hate; we will not surrender to anti-Zionism because it is a reinvention of anti-Semitism.”

French President Emmanuel Macron.

“ . . . We have, in Israel, a thriving democracy, a beacon of tolerance, an engine of enterprise and an example to the rest of the world for overcoming adversity and defying disadvantages . . . when you walk through Jerusalem or Tel Aviv that you see a country where people of all religions and sexualities are free and equal in the eyes of the law.”

British Prime Minister Teresa May.

It is evident that such leaders are but mere quislings who unashamedly regurgitate the slop they have subserviently slurped up from the Zionist sewer that is otherwise known as hasbara; who justify Israel’s barbaric ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people by parroting the hackneyed phrase of “Israel has a right to defend itself” while hypocritically denying that same right to the oppressed Palestinians; who treacherously question legitimate support for human rights by the BDS movement and instead stigmatise it as “anti-Semitic”; who are apparently unaware of the racist hate that Israelis openly express — as is readily available on the internet and YouTube ( — about non-Jews and Arabs in general and Palestinians in particular; who have no qualms about falsely and ingratiatingly commending Israel as an exemplary beacon of unimpeachable humanity and enlightened democracy; and who perfidiously provide unconditional aid, favour, preference and the political legitimacy that smokescreens the irrefutable criminality of a state hellbent on violently depriving the Palestinian people of their heritage, history, and inalienable legal and human rights. (

As to the question of the possible reversal of Zionism’s subversion of Western democracies and its supplanting of Judaism, the answer is a resounding “NO” unless the majority of people in the West are prepared recognise that their leaders’ first allegiance is to Israel instead of their own countries; that they are not citizens of democracies, but rather subjects of plutocracies; that by allowing themselves to be cowed into silent submission to Israel’s denial of human rights to the Palestinian people, they are unwittingly contributing to the gradual demise of their own much vaunted constitutional and human rights; and that by spinelessly doing so, they are also irresponsibly depriving future generations of those same inalienable rights.

“The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything.”

Albert Einstein

Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Search By Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Blogger App Icon
  • Twitter Basic Square