Israel’s Incremental Inhumanity Precludes the Right to Demand for Israelis That Which It so Violently Denies the Palestinian People
September 4, 2014
Anti-Semitism: The Ultimate Zionist Weapon
August 1, 2014
Tony Blair: The War Criminal Middle East “Peace” Envoy
September 9, 2014
The Recent Reemergence Of A Zionist-Nazi-Fascist Alliance Demands Unconditional International Cognisance And Condemnation Of Zionism’s Irrefutable Iniquity
December 15, 2014
“In working for Palestine, I would even ally myself with the devil.” Vladimir Jabotinsky, founder of Revisionist Zionism (Likud party roots) responding to condemnation for his alliance with Ukrainian pogromist Petlyura.
“The saving of the Jews in Europe did not figure at the head of the list of priorities of the ruling class. It was the foundation of the State which was primordial in their eyes.” Tom Segev,Le septième million (the Seventh Million) Ed. Liana Levi, Paris, 1993, p.539.
The recent spate of long overdue parliamentary votes throughout Europe to officially recognise the sovereignty of the state of Palestine has prompted the shadowy but pervasive and ever vigilant Zionist Gestapo Thought Police — whose function is to restrict and suppress any democratic ideal including free speech that dares to suggest Palestinians are a people entitled to justice and human rights on a par with anyone else — have stepped up their efforts to stem the spread of this “seditious” plague of European conscience which is now challenging the Zionist-imbued idea that support for the aspirations of the Palestinian people is a vile anti-Semitic denial of the Holocaust. While most religions are basically agreed on the fact that “God created mankind in His own image” (Genesis 1:27), those who so strenuously claim to have been chosen by God Himself — without a scintilla of evidence to meet any legal burden of proof — do not like the “godlikeness” concept being applied in general to other people, and in particular to Palestinians.
“Our race is the Master Race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves.”
Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin in a speech to the Knesset [Israeli Parliament] quoted by Amnon Kapeliouk, “Begin and the Beasts,” New Statesman, June 25, 1982.
With the Palestinians having just obtained observer status at the International Criminal Court (ICC) as a step towards full membership, and the upcoming December 18 European Union (EU) vote on a resolution recognising a Palestinian state — already postponed from November 25 due to the usual Zionist blackmail, bribery, and bullying — the Zionists are now pursuing all possible means of undermining the vote even to the extent of once again getting into bed with European Nazi-Fascists who like “God’s Chosen People” share an inhumane abhorrence for dark-skinned immigrants. The following video clip illustrates how bigotry and racism are venomous traits that are taught to the very young by the example of their elders:
After Sweden’s official decision to recognise Palestine followed by symbolic votes in Spain, the UK, Ireland, France (in both the lower and upper houses of parliament), and with others likely to follow, Israel now fears similar recognition by the EU Parliament whose frustration has been mounting due to Israel's unabated settlement expansion program on land the Palestinians still hope will be part of a state despite the failure of peace talks sponsored by the U.S. which while continuing to faint-heartedly claim that Israel’s ceaseless settlement building is an obstacle to peace, nonetheless acts as Israel’s advocate and provides more than $3 billion in annual aid. Shekel-grasping U.S. politicians and an ill-informed U.S. public either refuse or unable to recognise the simple fact that Zionist Israel does not want a peace that would mean the end of its ongoing theft of Palestinian land. For some inexplicable reason the Americans just don’t get it:
“The very point of Labor's Zionist program is to have as much land as possible and as few Arabs as possible!”
Yitzhak Navon (“moderate” ex-Israeli president and a leading labor party politician.) Cited on p.179 of Nur Masalha's A Land without a People who cites Bernard Avishai's The Tragedy of Zionism, 1985, p.340.
“All of the killed, with very few exceptions, were old men, women or children. The dead we found were all unjust victims, and none of them had died with a weapon in their hands.”
Eliyahu Arieli, Haganah member who arrived at Deir Yassin shortly after the massacre, O Jerusalem, Collins and Lapierre, 1972.
“In our country there is room only for the Jews. We shall say to the Arabs: Get out! If they don't agree, if they resist, we shall drive them out by force.”
Professor Ben-Zion Dinur, Israel's First Minister of Education, 1954, from History of the Haganah.
Israel has accordingly buttressed its opposition to European recognition of a Palestinian state with a Zionist-Nazi-Fascist alliance based on various common interests including opposition to Muslim immigrants in Europe. Furthermore, Israel’s arrogant presumption that it can insist on the rest of the world viewing its own barbaric criminality in a good light was yet again hysterically exercised when Switzerland announced its hosting of an international conference on how rules of war known as the Geneva Conventions apply in the Palestinian territories. Israel alleged that such a conference would bring into question Switzerland’s renowned neutrality. So once again the Neo-Nazi goose-stepping imperiousness of this terrorist state insists that while everyone else is subject to international law, it is not:
“Israel may have the right to put others on trial, but certainly no one has the right to put the Jewish people and the state of Israel on trial”
Such courting of Nazi and Fascist organisations and regimes by Zionism is by no means a new phenomenon and in 1941 Yitzhak Shamir committed . . .
“an unforgivable crime from the moral point of view: he preached an alliance with Hitler, with Nazi Germany, against Great Britain.” Bar Zohar, p.99, Le prophète armé: Ben Gourion, Fayard, Paris, 1966.
Further documentation of such an alliance was provided by Jewish author and activist, Lenni Brenner, who in his book 51 Documents cites a condemnable June 21, 1933, German Zionist Federation secret memorandum sent to the Nazis:
“Zionism has no illusions about the difficulty of the Jewish condition, which consists above all in an abnormal occupational pattern and in the fault of an intellectual and moral posture not rooted in one’s own tradition. Zionism recognised decades ago that as a result of the assimilationist trend, symptoms of deterioration were bound to appear, which it seeks to overcome by carrying out its challenge to transform Jewish life completely.
“It is our opinion that an answer to the Jewish question truly satisfying to the national state can be brought about only with the collaboration of the Jewish movement that aims at a social, cultural and moral renewal of Jewry–indeed, that such a national renewal must first create the decisive social and spiritual premises for all solutions.
“Zionism believes that a rebirth of national life, such as is occurring in German life through adhesion to Christian and national values, must also take place in the Jewish national group. For the Jew, too, origin, religion, community of fate and group consciousness must be of decisive significance in the shaping of his life. This means that the egotistic individualism which arose in the liberal era must be overcome by public spiritedness and by willingness to accept responsibility.”
Not only were the Zionists prepared to cooperate and work with the Nazis, but while Jews were were being persecuted and murdered, Zionist factions were jockeying for the privilege of an alliance with the Nazis so that by 1940-41, the Stern Gang, including later to become Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir of Israel, sent the Nazis the “Fundamental Features of the Proposal of the National Military Organisation (NMO) in Palestine (Irgun Zvai Leumi) Concerning the Solution of the Jewish Question in Europe and the Participation of the NMO in the War on the Side of Germany.” The following was announced by Avraham Stern and his henchmen:
“The NMO, which is well-acquainted with the goodwill of the German Reich government and its authorities towards Zionist activity inside Germany and towards Zionist emigration plans, is of the opinion that:
1. Common interests could exist between the establishment of a new order in Europe in conformity with the German concept, and the true national aspirations of the Jewish people as they are embodied by the NMO.
2. Cooperation between the new Germany and a renewed folkish-national Hebraium would be possible and,
3. The establishment of the historic Jewish state on a national and totalitarian basis, bound by a treaty with the German Reich, would be in the interest of a maintained and strengthened future German position of power in the Near East.
Proceeding from these considerations, the NMO in Palestine, under the condition the above-mentioned national aspirations of the Israeli freedom movement are recognised on the side of the German Reich, offers to actively take part in the war on Germany’s side.”
In 1987, Jim Allen’s play Perdition — which acknowledged Brenner’s 51 Documents — about Zionist-Jewish collaboration with the Nazis, was the subject of an intense campaign by the Jewish lobby to prevent its opening at the Royal Court Theatre in London. In other words the Jewish lobby was going to decide what the British public could and could not watch.
“Ever since the Jews invented the libel charge of ‘anti-Semitism’ in the 1880s. It was first printed in the Jewish Encyclopaedia (1901 Volume I, page 641), and has been built up with Jewish money, organisations, propaganda and lies (such as the Holocaust — Holohoax), so that now the word is like a snake venom which paralyses one’s nervous system. Even the mention of the word ‘Jew’ is shunned unless used in the most favourable and positive context.”
Charles a. Weisman, Who Is Esau-Edom?, Weisman Publications, 1966.
Unfortunately the fighting spirit of the British People — epitomised by Winston Churchill’s “We shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender” — was on that occasion very sadly lacking and censorship prevailed with the play being pulled because it may have offended some Jewish sensibilities. That Zionist-imposed fear of offending Jewish sensibilities persists to this day with censorship and Israeli-biased reporting in the mainstream media — including the license fee-funded pathetic BBC — on an unimaginable scale.
“I am pulling the play. Not because it contains any inaccuracies, or is in any way anti-Semitic, but because it might cause distress among some members of the Jewish community.”
Max Stafford-Clark, Artistic director of the Royal Court Theatre in a phone call to Jim Allen just 36 hours before the first screening of the play (From Ken Loach and Andrew Homung , Censorship & Perdition, New Statesman, 20th February 1987.
Despite its own irrefutable callousness with regards to the Holocaust, Zionism has continued to accuse the rest of the world of having been indifferent to the plight of the Jews while it simultaneously without shame uses the Holocaust for political gains at the expense of the Palestinians people. Accusing others serves as a smokescreen for a dark Zionist past with its indifference towards fellow Jews being sent to concentration camps; for Zionist collaboration with the Nazis and the Fascists; and for toleration of other Jews dying while Zionism was lobbying to rob the Palestinians of their country so as to create a an Apartheid Zionist state — a state without conscience or shame.
I have learned that the state of Israel cannot be ruled in our generation without deceit and adventurism.”
Moshe Sharett, Israel's first Foreign Minister and later a Prime Minister (p.51 Simha Flapan, The Birth of Israel, 1987.
Any unbiased scholarly study would conclude that Zionism has always been, still is, and always will be primarily concerned with advancing its own ideology and that the exploitation of past Jewish suffering including the Holocaust is essential to the success of that advancement. Make no mistake, Israel was not created for the Jewish people, it was created for the aggrandisement of a Zionism with the Jewish people serving as pawns. So perhaps the next time Jewish people in diaspora think about supporting the Zionist Apartheid state of Israel, they should first take time out to consider what Zionism thinks of them:
“One goat in Israel is worth more than the whole Diaspora.”
Yitzhak Greenbaum, head of the Jewish Agency's “Rescue Committee.”
“If I knew that it was possible to save all the children of Germany by transporting them to England, and only half by transferring them to the Land of Israel, I would choose the latter, for before us lies not only the numbers of these children but the historical reckoning of the people of Israel.” Ben-Gurion, Quoted on pp 855-56 in Shabtai Teveth's Ben-Gurion.